论文部分内容阅读
关于学术的问题,任何一个人都可以发表自己的见解,正因为有了不同的声音,才使一些问题变得更加清晰,更加明了。对于近年刚刚面世的《韩虎墓志》,赵艳华通过几个方面考证其为一品伪志,这是从学术出发的一种认真态度。当然,作为书法本体,我们更看重的是它的艺术价值,就像《古诗四帖》一样,孰真孰假一直就没有停止过,但其艺术价值是任何人都无法否认的。正因为如此,我们还是将《韩虎墓志》编排发表,其艺术风格和价值,对书法学习者来说,还是有一定价值的。当然,我们更愿意听到您针对《韩虎墓志》考证的不同声音,恭候您的来稿!
With regard to academic issues, anyone can express his opinion. It is because of the different voices that some of the issues have become clearer and clearer. For the “Han epitaphs” that have just been released in recent years, Zhao Yanhua tried his best to verify his illusion as a product in several aspects. This is a serious attitude from the academic level. Of course, as the calligraphic ontology, what we value is more its artistic value. Just like the “Four Poems of Ancient Versus,” nothing has stopped its true or false but its artistic value can not be denied by anyone. Because of this, we still publish the “Han Ti Epitaph” layout, and its artistic style and value, for calligraphy learners, still have some value. Of course, we are more willing to hear you for the “Han Ti epitaphs” different voices, waiting for your contributions!