论文部分内容阅读
【目的】了解编辑出版类专业期刊数字出版的现状,分析存在的问题,有针对性地提出对策与建议。【方法】访问国内三大数据库、期刊门户网站、期刊公众号和期刊APP,调查2014—2015年9种中文社会科学引文索引来源编辑出版类专业期刊。【结果】网络数据库仍然是最普遍、实现程度最高的数字出版形式;调查的期刊中,78%的期刊建立了独立的门户网站,但是网站数字出版与传播功能仍有待提升;78%的期刊建立了微信公众平台,但是存在栏目设置和推送内容雷同,关注度不高等问题。【结论】编辑出版类专业期刊的数字出版程度有待加深,个性化特点有待加强。期刊发展要走差异化、数字化集群之路,要提供有价值的增值服务。
【Objective】 To understand the status quo of digital publication of editorial and publishing professional journals, analyze existing problems and put forward countermeasures and suggestions pertinently. 【Method】 We visited three major domestic databases, periodical portals, periodicals and magazines, and investigated 9 categories of Chinese social science citations from 2014-2015. [Results] The network database is still the most common and the most accomplished form of digital publication. In the surveyed journals, 78% of the journals established independent portals, but the function of website digital publication and dissemination still needs to be improved; 78% of the periodicals are established WeChat public platform, but there is part of the column set and push the same content, attention is not high and so on. 【Conclusion】 The degree of digital publication of editors and periodicals needs to be deepened, and the individual characteristics need to be strengthened. Journals should take a differentiated and digitalized cluster to provide valuable value-added services.