论文部分内容阅读
现今仍有许多学者对《隋书.经籍志》总集多有收录某些作者的个人作品集存有争议,如“毛伯成诗一卷”、“江淹拟古诗一卷”等;清朝的大学者姚振宗在其《隋书.经籍志考证》中也对“毛伯成诗一卷”、“百国诗四十三卷”等作品集何以被编入总集存有疑问。对此,文章将《四库全书总目提要》总集序与《隋书.经籍志》总集之小序所述进行比较,并对《隋书.经籍志》总集中的多个作品集进行分析,最后提出《隋书.经籍志》总集的概念与《四库全书总目提要》总集的概念,与我们现在所理解之总集的概念有所不同;后两者的“总集”是单纯的总而集之,而《隋书.经籍志》总集是“选而集之,而后总为一类成为总集”的观点。
Today there are still many scholars on the “Sui Shu. Ji Ji Zhi” more than a collection of some of the author’s personal work is controversial, such as “Maobo Poetry Volume ”, ; Yao Zhenzong, a great university student in the Qing Dynasty, also compiled a collection of works such as “A Poem of Mao Tseng-chen” and “Baoguo Baoguo” in his Book of Sui Shu. doubt. In this regard, the article will “Sikuquanshuzongli” summary of the collection and “Sui Shu. Ji Ji Zhi” a small preface to compare the sequence, and the “Sui Shu. Ji Ji Zhi” a total concentration of multiple works Finally, we put forward the concept of “Sui Shu. Jingji Zhi” and the concept of “Si Ku Quan Shu He Mu”, which is different from the concept of the total set we now understand. The total set is simply a collection of the total. The collection of the Sui Shu. Ji Ji Zhi is a collection of “elections, and then always a set of classifications.”