论文部分内容阅读
目的:引进Holden等编制的心理痛苦量表,在中国大学生中进行信效度检验。方法:采取整群取样的方法对453名大学生集体施测,选取Beck绝望量表、Beck抑郁问卷、生活满意度量表、Beck自杀意念量表、无望抑郁—自杀倾向分量表和自杀尝试条目作为效度指标。结果:(1)量表单因素结构的拟合指数良好,χ~2/df=2.66,RMSEA=0.06,CFI=0.97,NFI=0.95,IFI=0.97;(2)心理痛苦量表与Beck绝望量表和Beck抑郁问卷的相关系数分别为0.50,0.53,与生活满意度量表相关系数为-0.39(P<0.01);(3)量表的内部一致性系数为0.90,分半信度为0.80,2周后的重测信度是0.60(n=58)。结论:心理痛苦量表中文版具有较好的信效度,可作为心理痛苦的测量工具。
OBJECTIVE: To introduce the psychological pain scales compiled by Holden et al. To test the reliability and validity of Chinese college students. METHODS: A total of 453 college students were enrolled in a cluster sampling study. The Beck Desperation Scale, Beck Depression Questionnaire, Life Satisfaction Scale, Beck Suicide Ideation Scale, Hopeless Depression-Suicide Tendency Scale and Suicide Attempt Entry Degree indicators. The results showed that: (1) The fitness index of scale form factor was good (χ ~ 2 / df = 2.66, RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.97, NFI = 0.95 and IFI = 0.97) The correlation coefficients between the questionnaire and Beck’s depression questionnaire were 0.50 and 0.53 respectively, and the correlation coefficient with life satisfaction scale was -0.39 (P <0.01). (3) The internal consistency coefficient was 0.90 and the half-reliability was 0.80. The test-retest reliability after 2 weeks was 0.60 (n = 58). Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Psychological Pain Scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as a measure of psychological pain.