论文部分内容阅读
在我国经济制度转轨过程中,为了扼制社会上一些谋取暴利的个人和集团,我国一些地方推出了反暴利法。反暴利法的出台,对维护我国社会主义市场经济的健康发展无疑具有重大意义。然审视各地出台的反暴利法,不难发现这些法规较注重现象,而忽视其实质,即引起暴利的原因。比如反暴利法大多规定,价格高于零售价的多少倍,便可定为暴利,量化分析成为界定暴利的唯一标准。笔者认为,仅以量化分析作为界定暴利的标准是不全面的。因为量化分析仅反映了事物的现象,但其并未揭示事物的实质。首先,在商品经济
In the course of the transition of our economic system, in order to curb the profiteering of individuals and groups in the society, the anti-tyranny law was introduced in some parts of our country. The promulgation of the anti-tyranny law undoubtedly has great significance in safeguarding the healthy development of our socialist market economy. While examining the anti-dumping law promulgated everywhere, it is not hard to find that these laws and regulations pay more attention to the phenomenon, while neglecting its essence, that is, the cause of excessive profits. For example, most anti-profiteering laws provide that if the price is higher than the retail price, it can be regarded as a huge profit. Quantitative analysis becomes the only criterion for defining profits. The author believes that only the quantitative analysis as a standard definition of profits is not comprehensive. Because quantitative analysis only reflects the phenomenon of things, but it does not reveal the substance of things. First, in the commodity economy