[目的]介绍某血站采血过程采用的消毒灭菌方法,并对其效果进行比较研究。[方法]对手和皮肤消毒先用碘伏涂抹法,后采用复合法:含500mg/L有效氯含氯消毒液浸泡5.0min后,涂抹2%碘酊作用1.0min,再75%消毒酒精脱碘;空气消毒采用紫外线照射60min;物体表面消毒采用含氯消毒液擦拭;血液渗漏污染后立即清除污染血液,然后根据消毒对象性质消毒灭菌处理。按《消毒技术规范》(2002年版)进行消毒灭菌效果检测,按《医院消毒卫生标准》(GB15982-1995)医疗机构Ⅱ类环境评价规定,比较复合法与碘伏涂抹法、空气消毒后使用前与工作完成后、物体表面2005年9月前后的合格率。[结果]对手和皮肤消毒碘伏涂抹法合格率为86.7%,而复合法达100%;空气消毒后使用前合格率为98.4%,工作完成后合格率仅63.7%;物体表面消毒后细菌菌落总数合格率逐年提高;血液渗漏污染消毒灭菌后合格率100%。[结论]对手和皮肤消毒复合法优于碘伏涂抹法;空气消毒后有人活动时质量下降;加强对相关人员培训后,物体表面消毒方面取得了良好效果;血液渗漏污染消毒灭菌合理有效。 [Objective] To introduce the method of disinfection and sterilization used in the blood collection of a blood station and to compare the effects of the two methods. [Method] The rifampicin and skin disinfectant was first treated with iodophor smear method and then compound method was used. After soaking in 500mg / L effective chlorine chlorine disinfectant solution for 5.0min, 2% iodine tincture was applied for 1.0min and then 75% disinfecting alcohol was deiodinated. Air disinfection with UV irradiation 60min; disinfection of the surface of the body with chlorine disinfectant wipe; blood leakage contaminated immediately after removal of contaminated blood, and then according to the nature of disinfection disinfection sterilization. According to the “Disinfection Technical Specification” (2002 Edition) for disinfection and sterilization test, according to “hospital disinfection health standards” (GB15982-1995) medical institutions Class Ⅱ environmental assessment requirements, the more complex method and iodophor smear method, air disinfection before use Before and after the work is completed, the surface of the object before and after September 2005 the passing rate. [Result] The qualified rate of applying iodine voltammetry to the hands and skin was 86.7%, while that of the composite method was 100%. The pass rate of air disinfection before use was 98.4% and the passing rate after work was only 63.7%. The bacterial colonies The total number of passing rate increased year by year; blood leakage contaminated sterilization rate of 100%. [Conclusion] The combination of antagonist and skin disinfection is superior to iodophor smearing; the quality of airborne disinfectant decreased when one was active; the effect of sterilizing the surface of the object was enhanced after the relevant personnel training was strengthened; the blood leakage and disinfection was effective and disinfected .