论文部分内容阅读
曹雪芹对《红楼梦》的著作权,自胡适考证确实以来,不断有人提出质疑乃至否定意见.远的不说,前几年就有人重提曹頫说.今年初,刘润为先生《曹渊:红楼的原始作者》一文又提出一个新的说法,即认为《红楼梦》的著作权当判归丰润曹鈖之子曹渊,而曹雪芹只是“进行再创作”的整理者.而且曹雪芹也不是曹寅的孙子,而是曹渊的兄弟行,可能是“曹渊的一个远房小弟”.刘文载于1994年1月8日《文艺报》,同时刊载的还有王家惠先生的《曹渊即曹颜——曹寅曾过继曹鈖之了》和周汝昌先生的《王文读后》.王文的观点已如标题所示,它是刘文立论的基础.周汝昌则对王文的考证表示“欣佩”.随之杨向奎先生在1994年3月9日《中国文化报.上撰文,赞许刘王二文“是画龙点睛的著作.王家惠画龙,而刘润为点睛.有此一点,全龙活了,而《红楼梦》一书原始作者的找出,使七十年来的悬案至此解决.胡适之先生有知,亦当引为知己.”杨先生并颇为乐观地开列了胡适以来七十年中“解决此一繁难的有功人物”,言外之意是,《红楼梦》的著作权问题至此方得以完满地解决.就我们所知,赞同这一观点的并非仅杨先生一人而
Cao Xueqin copyright of “Dream of Red Mansions”, since the Hu Shi research has been verified, some people have been questioned and even rejected the opinion. Far did not say that a few years ago someone re-cited Cao said. Earlier this year, Mr. Liu Runwei “Cao Yuan: Red House The author of the original article, ”put forward a new argument that the copyright of“ Dream of Red Mansions ”should be ruled by Cao Yuan, the son of Fengrun Cao Cao, while Cao Xueqin was merely the author of“ re-creation. ”And Cao Xueqin is not a grandson of Cao Yin, But Cao Yuan’s brotherhood may be “a distant brother brother of Cao Yuan.” Liu Wenzai in January 8, 1994 “literary newspaper”, also published by Mr. Wang Jiahui “Cao Yuan namely Cao Yan - Cao Yin had Following Cao Yong’s ”and Mr. Zhou Ruchang’s“ Wang Wen read. ”Wang Wen’s point of view has been as the title shows, it is the basis of Liu Wenli’s argument.Zhou Ruchang Wang Wen’s textual criticism that“ admire. ”Followed by Mr. Yang Xiangkui On March 9, 1994, “Chinese Culture Daily. Author, praise Liu Erwen” is the finishing touch of the book. Wong Ka Wai painting the dragon, and Liu Run for the finishing touch. At this point, the whole dragon alive, and “Dream of Red Mansions” a book Find out the original author so seventy Mr. Hu Shih-chih is knowledgeable and should be referred to as a confidant. “Mr. Yang was quite optimistic about the” solution to this difficult and powerful man “in the 70 years since Hu Shi. The implication was that” Dream of the Red Chamber " Of the copyright issue has been satisfactorily resolved to this end. To our knowledge, this view is not only one person and