论文部分内容阅读
对商品房交易中的欺诈行为应该采取什么样的法律规制,采用瑕疵担保责任下的补偿性制度还是《消费者权益保护法》中的惩罚性赔偿制度?这种制度选择的前提是厘清《消费者权益保护法》中所指的“商品”是否包括商品房。仅以解释学为基础的分析思路不足以承担论证制度创新与制度变迁之重任,只有借助价值法学、法经济学和法社会学的规范进路,司法实践中所采用的适度的惩罚性赔偿制度才能具有规范意义上的合理性和正当性。
What kind of legal regulation should be taken for the fraudulent activities in the real estate transaction, whether to adopt the compensatory system under the responsibility of guarantee of defectiveness or the punitive damages system in the “Consumer Protection Law”? The prerequisite of this system choice is to clarify the concept of “ Equity Protection Law ”refers to the “ commodity ”whether to include commercial housing. Merely based on hermeneutic analysis of ideas is not enough to bear the burden of argumentation system innovation and institutional changes, only with the help of value jurisprudence, law and economics and sociology of law and standardize the approach used in judicial practice, moderate punitive damages In order to have a sense of legitimacy and legitimacy.