论文部分内容阅读
随着学术的发展与法治进程的进步,国内外刑法学界对社会危害性这一概念的态度总是存在这样那样的诘难。在不同的犯罪论体系下,对社会危害性概念的认识存在差异。导致这种差异的原因包括:犯罪构成方面、认定犯罪路径方面等。无论是哪一种犯罪构成体系,都不能否认社会危害性的重要作用,已是一种不争事实。关键在于怎么区分社会危害性,将其纳入构成要件中,进而将其机能能合理彰显,是本文研究的重点。
With the development of academia and progress of the rule of law, attitudes of the criminal law academics both at home and abroad to the concept of social harmfulness always have such a difficulty. Under different systems of crime, there are differences in understanding of the concept of social harmfulness. Reasons for this difference include: the composition of crime, the identification of criminal routes, etc. No matter what type of crime constitutes a system, we can not deny the important role of social harm, it is an indisputable fact. The key lies in how to differentiate the social harmfulness and incorporate it into the constitutional requirements so that its function can be demonstrated reasonably. This is the focus of this paper.