论文部分内容阅读
【摘要】目的：比較两种方法评价全髋关节置换前后髋关节活动能力。 方法：对62例实施人工全髋关节置换术后患者，采用两种评价法评价，并比较两种方法的一致性。结果：两种方法评价髋关节置换术后活动能力效果差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：国内学者李子荣制定的髋关节功能的评定方法可代替Harris髋关节评分。
【关键词】髋关节置换；髋关节活动能力；评价方法
【中图分类号】R274【文献标识码】B【文章编号】1008-6455（2011）10-0107-02The compare study of two kinds of evaluate methods on the hip activities after total hip replacement
Qian Dingjun
【Abstract】Objective: To study two evaluate methods on the hip activities after total hip replacement. Methods: 62 patients with total hip replacement,was evaluated by two methods,and campare the consistency of two methods. Results: there was no significant differences between the two kinds of methods. Conclusion: The Harris hip score can be replaced by the method of assessing the function of the hip established by Domestic scholars .
【Key words】Hip replacement; Hip activity ability; Evaluation method
【关键词】髋关节置换；髋关节活动能力；评价方法
【中图分类号】R274【文献标识码】B【文章编号】1008-6455（2011）10-0107-02The compare study of two kinds of evaluate methods on the hip activities after total hip replacement
Qian Dingjun
【Abstract】Objective: To study two evaluate methods on the hip activities after total hip replacement. Methods: 62 patients with total hip replacement,was evaluated by two methods,and campare the consistency of two methods. Results: there was no significant differences between the two kinds of methods. Conclusion: The Harris hip score can be replaced by the method of assessing the function of the hip established by Domestic scholars .
【Key words】Hip replacement; Hip activity ability; Evaluation method