对于某集团公司监事长案件的争议焦点有三:一是对此案件的判决是合法但不合理的。二是认为该当事人的行为虽然触犯了法律,但在道德上是值得颂扬的。三是认为此人并不构成犯罪,并不应当做出有最判决。笔者认为,法院对此人的有罪判决是合法并且合理的,此人的犯罪行为不只不符合法律规定,也不符合道德要求,而对当事人作出的有罪判决,是维护社会稳定与法律权威的需要。 There are three main issues in dispute over the case of a chairman of a group company: First, the judgment on the case is legal but unreasonable. Second, it is morally worthwhile to think that the party’s behavior violated the law. Third, that this person does not constitute a crime, and should not make the most verdict. The author believes that the court of this person’s guilty verdict is legal and reasonable, and this person’s criminal act not only does not meet the law and does not meet the moral requirements, and the parties to make a guilty verdict is to maintain the social stability and legal authority needs .