论文部分内容阅读
被追诉人(含犯罪嫌疑人、被不起诉人、被告人)在刑事诉讼中的合法权益保障,始终是现当代多国设计刑事诉讼制度过程中着重考虑的问题之一。证人作证制度是保障被追诉者合法权益的核心制度设计之一。我国2012年刑事诉讼法修正案最终确立了强制证人出庭制度。然而,该法实施以来,根据我们对“强制证人出庭作证”问题的跟踪与实证调研,上至最高人民法院、高级及中级人民法院,下至被调研的基层人民法院,“强制证人出庭作证”都受到了冷遇。由于理论基础研究不充分,强制证人出庭作证制度赖以依存的一系列配套制度、规则和原则在我国现行刑诉法框架下并未健全,零敲碎打式地引进确立的强制证人出庭作证制度对于查明案件事实、保障被追诉人合法权益的实际效果仍需进一步深入的实证研究,寻求相关配套制度的支撑。
The protection of the lawful rights and interests of criminal prosecutors (including criminal suspects, non-prosecutors and defendants) in criminal proceedings has always been one of the most important issues in the design of criminal procedure systems in many countries today and in the contemporary era. Witness testimony system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the prosecution one of the core system design. The amendment of China’s Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 finally established the system of mandatory witness’s appearance in court. However, since the implementation of the law, according to our tracking and empirical research on the issue of “witness testifying in court”, the Supreme People’s Court, the High People’s Court and the Intermediate People’s Court went down to the grassroots people’s courts under investigation, and “Compulsory Witness Appearing in court to testify ”have been cold reception. Due to the lack of theoretical basis, a series of supporting systems, rules and principles on which witness compelled to appear in court testify system are not perfect under the current criminal procedural law framework in our country. The introduction of piecemeal system of mandatory witness to testify in court provides evidence- The facts of the case and the actual effect of safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the accused still need further empirical research to seek the support of relevant supporting systems.