论文部分内容阅读
作为开证行,对于开证后是否可以修改通知行这一问题,关注的核心是要确保信用证不会被重复通知。案例背景M银行客户A公司与其交易对手英国M公司之间长期以来都是采用托收D/P AT SIGHT方式进行结算,M公司选用的代收行一直是N银行。但从2015年8月份后,A公司与M公司的结算方式由D/P即期改为D/A远期,并要求M银行对单据加具保付。
As the issuing bank, the issuing bank for the issue of whether to amend the notice line, the focus of attention is to ensure that credit will not be repeated notice. Case Background M Bank Clients A Company and its counterparty M Company in the United Kingdom have long used the collection D / P AT SIGHT method to settle their accounts. The collection company M has been using has always been N Bank. However, from August 2015, the settlement method of Company A and Company M was changed from D / P to D / A forward immediately, and M Bank was required to insure the documents.