论文部分内容阅读
20世紀上半葉,中國史學經歷了幾次重要轉型。其中以胡適等人為代表的“新史學”的興起,成為史學現代化的主要標誌。然而,“新”、“舊”之間是否涇渭分明?由“舊”到“新”的歷程,是否為單向、單線的演進?中國史學的自我更新,是否出現過其它的可能性?這些,都有待治史者更為深入的研究。本文擬從四川學者劉咸炘的“校讎哲學”入手,重構一場幾乎為人遺忘的史學範式之爭。
In the first half of the 20th century, Chinese history underwent several important transformations. Among them, the rise of “new historiography” represented by Hu Shi et al. Has become the major symbol of the modernization of historiography. However, is the distinction between “new” and “old”, from “old” to “new”, whether it is a one-way or one-line evolution? Whether self-renewal of Chinese historiography occurs There are other possibilities? These are the more in-depth studies to be done by the historians. This article attempts to start with the “Philosophical School” of scholar Liu Xianti in Sichuan, and reconstruct an almost forgotten historical dispute over history.