论文部分内容阅读
在构建和谐社会的背景下,司法和谐问题成为法学界研究的重要问题。对于司法和谐的内涵,很多学者发表论文进行了界定,但尚未达成共识。司法和谐既包括过程的和谐,也包括结果的和谐,以后者为主。司法实践中衡量和判断司法和谐与否的三个标准是司法过程是否和谐、结案方式是否和谐以及处理结果是否和谐。这三个判断标准的总结和归纳不但对于理解司法和谐的内涵具有重要意义,而且对于进一步研究司法和谐政策的运行,以及该政策对于法官司法行为的影响都有重要作用。
In the context of building a harmonious society, the problem of judicial harmony has become an important issue for the study of jurisprudence. For the meaning of judicial harmony, many scholars have published papers defined, but not yet reached a consensus. Judicial harmony includes both the process of harmony, but also the harmony of the results, the latter dominated. The three criteria for judging and judging judicial harmony in judicial practice are whether the judicial process is harmonious, whether the settlement method is harmonious and whether the handling result is harmonious. The summarization and induction of these three criteria not only have important meanings for understanding the connotation of judicial harmony, but also play an important role in further studying the operation of the judicial harmony policy and the impact of the policy on the judicial behavior of judges.