论文部分内容阅读
目的观察疤痕子宫与非疤痕子宫剖宫产术后的疗效。方法收集2013年3月-2014年9月医院诊断为疤痕子宫的产妇50例作为研究组,将同期我院进行首次剖宫产者50例作为对照组,对比2组手术时间、术中出血量、新生儿Apgar评分及新生儿体质量。结果 2组手术时间、术中出血量、新生儿Apgar评分及新生儿体质量结果比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组宫缩乏力、胎盘粘连、胎盘植入结果比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床医师须严格掌握剖宫产指征,认真评估患者手术风险,以降低社会因素剖宫产率。
Objective To observe the curative effect of cesarean section in non-scarring and non-scarring uterus. Methods Fifty cases of maternal hospital diagnosed as scar uterus from March 2013 to September 2014 were selected as the study group. Fifty cases of the first cesarean section in our hospital were selected as the control group during the same period. The operative time, the amount of intraoperative blood loss Neonatal Apgar score and neonatal body weight. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, neonatal Apgar score and neonatal body weight were significantly different between the two groups (P <0.05). 2 groups of uterine atony, placenta accreta, placenta accreta compared results were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Clinicians must strictly observe the indication of cesarean section and carefully evaluate the surgical risk in order to reduce the cesarean section rate of social factors.