论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院正全面推进“规范裁判文书格式、强化裁判文书说理”的改革,并致力于深化裁判文书公开的平台建设。此时借鉴相关的比较法资源,或许能为我们提供一些有益的线索。作为传统的大陆法系国家,德国的司法体制与诉讼制度以精密、规整而著称。其裁判文书说理的格式、内容和方法,值得我们研究。本文主要介绍德国第一审民事诉讼判决书的说理进路,按照判决书的各部结构依次展开。
The Supreme People’s Court is fully advancing the reform of “standardizing the format of adjudication documents and strengthening the justification of judicial documents” and is committed to deepening the open platform for the publication of arbitration instruments. At this point learn from the relevant comparative law resources, may be able to provide us with some useful clues. As a traditional civil law country, Germany’s judicial system and litigation system are well-known for its precision and regularity. The format, content and method of its referee instruments deserve our study. This article mainly introduces the reasoning procedure of the judgment of first instance in Germany. According to the structure of the ministries of judgments, it starts in turn.