论文部分内容阅读
目的调查灾后救援人员替代性创伤和应对方式状况,并分析二者的相关性。方法采用灾难救助者替代性创伤问卷和特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)对唐山市205名赴四川抗震救灾人员进行调查分析。结果 1性别、婚姻状况不同的救援人员在替代性创伤总分上无显著差异(P>0.05);接受过培训的救援人员其替代性创伤总分显著低于未接受过培训的救援人员(t=-2.329,P<0.05);2救援人员积极应对得分显著高于常模(t=7.868,P<0.001),消极应对得分与常模无显著差异;3除生活信念因子外,替代性创伤总分及其他各因子与积极应对方式呈显著负相关(P<0.05或P<0.01);替代性创伤总分及其各因子与消极应对方式呈显著正相关(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论 1替代性创伤不受性别、婚姻状况的影响,但受是否接受培训的影响;救援人员应对机制良好;2替代性创伤与应对方式的2个因子相关密切。
Objective To investigate the status of alternative trauma and coping styles of emergency workers after disaster and to analyze their correlation. Methods A total of 205 Sichuan earthquake relief workers in Tangshan City were surveyed using the Disaster Rescue Trauma Alternative Questionnaire (TSSQ) questionnaire. Results There was no significant difference (P> 0.05) in the total substitute injury scores among the rescue workers of different sexes and marital status; the total substitute injury scores of the trained rescue workers were significantly lower than those of untrained rescue workers (t = -2.329, P <0.05); 2 the scores of rescue workers were significantly higher than that of norm (t = 7.868, P <0.001); there was no significant difference between negative coping scores and norm; (3) The total scores and other factors were negatively correlated with the coping style (P <0.05 or P <0.01). There was a significant positive correlation between the total score of alternative trauma and each factor and the coping style (P <0.05 or P <0.01) . Conclusions 1 Alternative trauma is not affected by gender and marital status, but is affected by training or not. The response mechanism of aid workers is good.2 The two factors of alternative trauma and coping style are closely related.