论文部分内容阅读
反叛自古以来便是文学作品中经久不衰的主题。自古以来,世界文坛上以反叛为主题的作品汗牛充栋。而在文学人物长廊中,反叛性格鲜明的人物亦比比皆是,构成了一道别致的风景线,在世界文学中占据着重要的位置。而反叛人物,即非统治精英在面对权力体系进行挑战时,又因其性格、所处环境之不同,而导致不同的命运。日本文豪夏目漱石的代表作《哥儿》和我国古典名著《西游记》就因塑造了哥儿和孙悟空两个经典的反叛形象而取得了巨大的成功。本文试从权力体系对个人的规范、制裁,以及个人的反叛及其人生轨迹、命运等角度,对两部作品进行比较分析。
Rebellion has been an enduring theme in literary works since ancient times. Since ancient times, the rebellious themed works in the world literary arena are numerous. In the literary figure promenade, people of rebellious personality are also everywhere, forming a unique landscape and occupying an important position in world literature. In the face of the challenge of the power system, rebel figures, that is, non-ruling elites, have different destinies because of their different personalities and environment. Sobatsu, the masterpiece of Japanese writer Soseki Natsume, and the classic Journey to the West by our country's classic masterpiece, Journey to the West made great success because of the two classic rebel images of Brother and Sun Wukong. This article tries to make a comparative analysis of the two works from the point of view of the power system to regulate individuals, sanctions, as well as personal rebellion and life trajectory, fate and so on.