论文部分内容阅读
当事人通过提起侵权之诉来逃避仲裁条款效力的方法,不管从理论上来讲,还是从我国的司法实践来说,都是不能被接受的。但是对于当事人增加共同被告制造诉讼当事人多于仲裁协议当事人的情况下仲裁协议的效力范围如何,在理论上和实践上还有较大争议。法院应该以更为开放和支持的态度来对待国际商事仲裁,在有关此类案件的处理中主动地对自己的职权进行必要的限制而不是扩张。我国最高人民法院在“WP公司案”中所体现出来的完全倒向诉讼一边的倾向值得我们反思。
The method by which the parties evaded the validity of the arbitration clause by suing for infringement is unacceptable both in theory and in our country’s judicial practice. However, there is still much controversy both theoretically and practically regarding the scope of the validity of the arbitration agreement in the case that the parties increase the number of litigants who make the lawsuit more than the parties to the arbitration agreement. The courts should treat international commercial arbitration in a more open and supportive manner, and take the initiative to impose the necessary restrictions on their own authority instead of expanding in the handling of such cases. Our Supreme People’s Court in the “WP company case” reflected in the full reversal of litigation on the side of the tendency we deserve reflection.