论文部分内容阅读
本文是在经济行政法框架内对美国诉银联案的分析。首先是国民待遇原则的介绍,分析将侧重于主题语境之下的适用。其次,银联案中对于银联是否具有垄断地位与国民待遇原则的冲突是本文的核心部分,这一部分涉及到我国银联性质、地位及其功能的简要介绍,以及国际经济行政法视野下国民待遇原则的运用,也针对案件具体涉及的美国有关宪法的平等原则、经济行政法的域外效力有所涉及。再次,对于国民待遇原则的经济行政法功能进行分析,以及结合本案得出一些启示。最后,从经济行政法理论角度,对于国民待遇的发展与我国经济行政法的构建方面寄予展望。
This article analyzes the U.S. v. United Bank case within the framework of Economic Administrative Law. The first is introduction of the principle of national treatment, and the analysis will focus on the application under the thematic context. Secondly, the clash between the Unionpay case and UnionPay’s monopoly status and the national treatment principle is the core part of this article. This part relates to the brief introduction of China UnionPay’s nature, status and function, as well as the principle of national treatment from the perspective of international economic administrative law It also deals with the extraterritorial effectiveness of the administrative law of the economy in the light of the principle of equality of the United States concerning the constitution that is specifically covered in the case. Third, analyze the function of the economic administrative law of the principle of national treatment, and draw some enlightenment with the case. Finally, from the perspective of the theory of economic administrative law, we expect the development of national treatment and the construction of our country’s economic administrative law.