论文部分内容阅读
目前对于红军长征过藏区史实的构建,主要依凭来自红军方面的种种记述与回忆,多为一种“自证”的史料。如何挖掘“他证”史料以印证、弥补和充实红军方面的记述与回忆,对于红军过藏区的史料建设有着特别重要的意义。本文以康藏研究学者任乃强于1936-1941年间形成的一个记叙红军过川西藏区的文本为线索,通过同其他相关史料的对照与参证,考察分析了红军长征过藏区的相关史实。文章发现,任乃强这一记叙红军过藏区的文本不但秉承了学者的客观、中立立场,且基于藏族民众的调查并有着当地视角,真实记述了红军过藏区的情况,对红军长征过藏区的历史研究是一条珍贵的“他证”史料。
At present, the historical facts of Tibet in the long march of the Red Army mainly depend on various descriptions and memories from the Red Army and are mostly historical materials of “self-evidence.” How to excavate the historical data to prove, make up and enrich the Red Army’s records and memories is of particular importance to the historical materials construction of the Tibetan area of the Red Army. Based on the text of the report of the Tibetan researcher Ren Naiqiang from 1936 to 1941, describing the Red Army over the Tibetan region of Tibet as a clue, this paper investigates and analyzes the historical facts about the Long March Tibetan Borders by comparing and certifying with other relevant historical materials. The article finds that Ren Naqiang, the memorial of the Red Cross’s possession of the Tibetan area, adheres not only to the scholar’s objective and neutral stance, but also on the basis of investigations by Tibetan people and a local perspective, a true account of the Red Cross’s possession of the Tibetan areas and the Tibetan Red Cross The historical study is a precious historical evidence.