检察院受理案件后在刑事拘留状态下,对案件进行审查并向法院提起公诉被称为“刑拘直诉”。这种诉讼方式值得商榷。笔者认为,无论是审查起诉还是审判均不应当在刑事拘留状态下进行,应当予以纠正。一、“刑拘直诉”诉讼方式存在的主要弊端第一,该诉讼方式违背了刑事诉讼法的立法本意。从刑事诉讼法第八十九条以及一百六十五条对刑事拘留和逮捕的相关规定中可以看出,刑事拘留时间的延续是以“需要逮捕”为前提的。如果 Procuratorate accepted the case after the state of criminal detention, to examine the case and filed a lawsuit to the court known as . This method of litigation is debatable. The author believes that neither prosecution nor trial should be conducted in criminal detention and should be corrected. First, “criminal detention prosecution ” The main drawbacks of the litigation method First, the lawsuit violates the legislative intent of the Criminal Procedure Law. As can be seen from the relevant provisions of articles 89 and 165 of the Criminal Procedure Law on criminal detention and arrest, the continuation of criminal detention is based on the premise of “arrest required”. in case