虽然罗尔斯的分配正义理论与马克思的分配正义思想分别代表着两个不同的思想流派,但在有些方面他们的理论是不谋而合的。仅从财富分配角度看,罗尔斯的分配正义理论和马克思的分配理论就具有很强的相似性,都很注重在特定的社会结构与社会条件下,主张分配规则或分配原则的正义,而对于分配的结果是否平均则显得较为漠视。 Although Rawls’s theory of distributive justice and Marx’s distributive justice respectively represent two different schools of thought, in some respects their theories coincide. Only from the perspective of wealth distribution, Rawls’s distributive justice theory and Marx’s distributive theory have very strong similarities, and all attach great importance to the justice of assigning rules or assigning principles under certain social structures and social conditions For the distribution of the results are average is more ignored.