论文部分内容阅读
《明史·李自成传》载,清顺治二年,“自成走延宁、蒲圻,至通城,窜于九宫山。”李自成是否到过通城,本文不愿涉及。但至于延宁一名,查《明史·地理志》、《寰宇通志》及《读史方舆纪要》皆无踪影。按:“延宁”为“咸宁”之误,即今湖北咸宁县。延宁、咸宁音近而误。据《绥寇纪略》卷九:“自成将东下,遇风雹,乃以四月二十四日改由金牛、保安走咸宁、蒲圻,过通城九宫山。”《湖北通志》卷六十九:“自成走咸宁、蒲圻至通城,窜九宫山。”光绪十一年重修《武昌县志》卷八:“流贼李白成主武昌,谋夺舟南下,改由金牛、保安、走咸宁、蒲圻过通城。”即是咸宁误为延宁的确证。
“Ming Dynasty Li Zicheng Biography” contains, Qing Shunzhi two years, “since the departure of Ning, Pu Pu, to the city, channeling in Jiugongshan.” Whether Li Zicheng has been through the city, this article is unwilling to be involved. However, as for Yan Ning, there is no trace of the “Ming History and Geography”, “Universal Annals” and “History of Fang Yu”. Press: “Yanning” as “Xianning” error, now Xianning County, Hubei Province. Yanning, Xianning sound near error. According to “Sui Kou Ji Lue” Volume 9: “Since its formation will be the east, met with hail, but by April 24 changed Taurus, security go Xianning, Pu Mi, through the city Jiugongshan.” “Hubei Tongzhi” Volume sixty-nine: “Since the departure of Xianning, Pu 圻 to the city, channeling Jiugongshan.” Guangxu eleven years of rebuilt “Wuchang County,” Volume VIII: “Li Bai Chengzhu Wuchang, seized Zhounan, replaced by Taurus , Security, take Xianning, Pu Li through the city. ”That is, Xianning mistaken for the confirmation of Yaning.