论文部分内容阅读
胡适的《中国哲学史大纲》(卷上)之所以成为中国哲学史学科的开山之作,从他后来所作的概述中可以找到原因:“我这本书的特别立场是要抓住每一位哲人或每一个学派的‘名学方法’(逻辑方法,即知识思考的方法),认为这是哲学史的中心问题。”(胡适,1991年,第5页)胡适很早就注意到先秦各家都有其治学的方法,具体表现为各有一套“名学”。从一定程度说,正是这个敏锐的洞见开创了中国哲学史的新纪元。然而胡适热衷于从知识论和逻辑学的视角理解名学,这就限制以至阻碍了中国哲学的进一步发展。有见于此,梁启超很早就对胡适的这本书下过一个断语:“凡关于知识论方面,到处发现石破天惊的伟论;凡关于宇宙观人生观方面,什有九很浅薄或谬误。”(梁启超)
The reason why Hu Shih’s Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy (Volume 1) became a masterpiece in the history of Chinese philosophy can be found in his later overview: “My book’s special position is to grasp each The philosophical method (logical method, ie method of intellectual thinking) of the philosopher or every school of thought is regarded as central to the history of philosophy. ”(Hu Shih, 1991, p.5) Hu Shih had noticed very early Each pre-Qin school has its own method of study, the specific performance of each have a “name ”. To some extent, it is this keen insight that opens up a new era in the history of Chinese philosophy. However, Hu Shi is keen on understanding Ming Scholarship from the perspective of epistemology and logic, which limits and even hinders the further development of Chinese philosophy. In view of this, Liang Qichao soon made a remark on Hu Shih’s book: “Wherever he goes about epistemology, he finds astonishing tremendous insights; there are nine superficial or fallacious opinions about the cosmological outlook on life.” "(Liang Qichao)