论文部分内容阅读
教育界的右倾机会主义者,不仅攻击党的领导和党的教育方钟,也攻击总路线,大跃进和人民公社。不过,他们总是以“关心教育”的卫道者的姿态出现,而达到从根本上反对总路线、大跃进和人民公社的目的的。他们伪装得很巧妙,手段也更加阴队毒辣。例如他们说:“大跃进、公社化以来,家庭教育问题很大,父母、哥哥、姐姐、娭(母也)都去生产了,小孩在家没人管。”很显然,这里攻击的,不只是儿童教育问题,主要矛头是对准大跃进和人民公社。右倾机会主义者为什么那样热衷于所谓家庭教育问题而喋喋不休呢?无非是污蔑我们的人民公社“破坏了家庭”。这与杜勒斯之流的声音又有什么不同?与人民公社“搞早了”、“搞糟了”的谬论又有什么不同呢?
Right opportunists in the education sector not only attack the party’s leadership and the party’s education square, but also attack the general line, the Great Leap Forward and the people’s communes. However, they always appear in the posture of the “care-for-education” sanctuary and achieve the purpose of fundamentally opposing the general line, the Great Leap Forward and the people’s communes. They are very clever disguise, the means are more sinister. For example, they said: “Since the Great Leap Forward and communalization, family education has been a big issue. Parents, older brothers, older sisters, and sons (both parents) have gone to production. There is no one at home.” Obviously, it is not only the The main issue of children’s education is targeting the Great Leap Forward and the people’s communes. Why do right-wing opportunists chatter about being so keen on the so-called family education issue? It is nothing more than slandering our people’s communes to “undermine the family.” What is the difference between this and the voice of Dulles? What is the difference with the people’s commune’s fallacy of “getting ahead” and “messing up”?