论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析对急诊收治重症心力衰竭老年患者治疗方案选择及其对应临床疗效差异。方法:纳入80例于本院急诊科2012年-2015年期间接受诊治重症心力衰竭老年患者为本次研究对象,设其中40例用常规抗心衰治疗干预患者为对照组,余下40例患者联合左卡尼汀药物干预并设为观察组。比较不同治疗方案对老年心力衰竭患者临床影响。结果:经疗效评估,观察组有3例患者判定无效,对照组有11例患者判定无效,组间总有效率对比有差异性(P<0.05)。结论:急诊内科收治老年重症心力衰竭患者在制定治疗方案时在常规抗心衰治疗基础上与左卡尼汀相联合,能取得相对更为突出临床疗效且对患者相关体征改善有重要价值,值得临床推广。
Objective: To explore the treatment options for elderly patients with severe heart failure admitted to the emergency department and their corresponding clinical efficacy differences. Methods: A total of 80 elderly patients admitted to our emergency department during 2012 to 2015 were selected as the study subjects. Forty of them were treated with conventional anti-heart failure treatment as the control group, and the remaining 40 patients were combined L-carnitine drug intervention and set as the observation group. The clinical effects of different treatment regimens on elderly patients with heart failure were compared. Results: After the curative effect evaluation, 3 patients in the observation group were found to be ineffective, 11 patients in the control group were found to be ineffective and the total effective rate was significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusion: Emergency medical treatment of elderly patients with severe heart failure in the development of treatment options in the conventional anti-heart failure treatment based on the combination of L-carnitine, can achieve a more prominent clinical efficacy and improvement of the patient-related signs of significant value, it is worth Clinical promotion.