论文部分内容阅读
权利人通过合同执行区别定价策略来获取知识产权法下难以获得的利益,属于权利的私人定制。权利人通过合同对知识产权权利限制制度予以反限制、对知识产权法不保护的客体提供保护、对知识产权进行知识产权法之外的限制,这些合同条款可否执行需要我们谨慎考虑其合法性。通过合同执行区别定价既有可能具有激励创新之效应,也有可能存在对公共利益侵蚀之威胁,因此需要在利益平衡原则的指导下,以合同法维护契约正义的制度为核心来考虑这些合同条款是否违反了知识产权法的强制性规定、是否属于排除对方主要权利的格式合同、是否属于显失公平之情形。
The right holders through the implementation of the contract to implement different pricing strategy to obtain the benefits of intellectual property law is difficult to obtain, belong to the rights of private custom. The right holder through the contract to limit the system of intellectual property rights to the restrictions on the protection of intellectual property law does not protect the object of intellectual property rights outside the intellectual property laws and restrictions on the implementation of these contract terms require that we carefully consider its legitimacy. Differentiating pricing through contract may not only have the effect of stimulating innovation but also threaten the erosion of public interests. Therefore, under the guidance of the principle of balance of interests, it is necessary to consider whether the contract terms are the core of contractual law in the contract law. Violation of the mandatory provisions of intellectual property law, whether it belongs to exclude the other party’s main form of the right contract, is obviously unfair circumstances.