论文部分内容阅读
《离骚》的释名、写作年代和组织结构 ,千古纷争 ,歧见迭出。然司马迁、王逸释名 ,于诂训有据 ,于文情相符 ,最为妥贴。《离骚》既非作于一些学者所谓的第一次流放期间 ,也非作于第二次流放期间 ,更不是“绝命之作” ,而是作于两次流放之间。《离骚》以屈原自身经历为线索 ,以理想现实的冲突为核心 ,以“余”、“党人”、“哲王”三方矛盾相交织 ,或实或虚 ,或真或幻 ,凭心而言 ,以意运法。大而划之 ,首末两段 ;细而分之 ,首段五层 ,末段三层
“Li Sao” release name, writing age and organizational structure, eternal disputes, differences one after another. However, Sima Qian, Wang Yi release name, in Sui training evidence, in line with the situation, the most appropriate. “Li Sao” is neither the first exile period nor the second exile period described by some scholars, nor is it the “extinct work”, but the second exile. Lisao takes Qu Yuan’s own experience as a clue and the ideal reality conflict as the core, with “Yu”, “Party” and “Zhe Wang” interwoven with each other, either real or imaginary, true or false, Say, to the law. Big and draw, first and last two; fine and divided, the first paragraph of five, the last three