论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较腹部B超与阴道B超在诊断异位妊娠中的效果。方法异位妊娠患者共86例,随机分为研究组与对照组,各43例。研究组给予阴道B超诊断,对照组给予腹部B超诊断,对诊断结果进行分析。结果研究组患者B超诊断结果符合率97.67%显著高于对照组76.74%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且研究组疾病类型的漏诊率(2.38%)和误诊率(0)均低于对照组(16.28%和6.98%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阴道B超诊断异位妊娠临床符合率较高,疾病诊断结果更为准确。
Objective To compare the effects of abdominal B-ultrasound and vaginal B-ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Methods A total of 86 patients with ectopic pregnancy were randomly divided into study group and control group, with 43 cases in each group. The study group was given vaginal B-ultrasound diagnosis, the control group was given abdominal B-ultrasound diagnosis, the diagnosis results were analyzed. Results The coincidence rate of B-mode ultrasonography in study group was 97.67%, which was significantly higher than 76.74% in control group (P <0.05), and the misdiagnosis rate (2.38%) and misdiagnosis rate Lower than the control group (16.28% and 6.98%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Vaginal ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy clinical coincidence rate is higher, the diagnosis of the disease is more accurate.