论文部分内容阅读
我国反垄断法及其司法解释都规定了因垄断行为给他人造成损失的,要承损害赔偿责任。此处的损害赔偿责任在于填补损失,但在实际中因垄断而造成的损害与普通的民事损害有很大不同,仅规定普通民事损害赔偿责任难以达到反垄断立法的特殊需求和立法目的。本文总结国内外立法,以论述将惩罚性赔偿引入我国反垄断法的必要性及其立法选择。
Our country’s antitrust law and its judicial interpretation all stipulate that the monopoly act causes the loss to others, should undertake the liability for damages. The responsibility for damages here lies in filling the losses, but in reality, the damage caused by the monopoly is very different from ordinary civil damages. It is only stipulated that it is difficult to meet the special requirements and legislative purposes of antitrust legislation by ordinary civil liability for damages. This article summarizes the domestic and foreign legislation to discuss the necessity of introducing punitive damages into our antitrust law and its legislative options.