论文部分内容阅读
司法界、法学界普遍认为当代中国存在“司法公信力缺失”的问题,但多项调查的数据却显示民众司法信任度较高,本文将这一矛盾现象称为“司法信任认知偏移”。为解释这一现象,本文运用CGSS2010和CGSS2012数据开展研究。研究发现:一方面,作为信任对象的司法系统处于“梯度信任”之中,对司法系统的信任度介于中央政府与地方政府之间。“司法信任认知偏移”现象背后蕴含着东西方文化和体制的差异。另一方面,民众对司法系统的信任存在阶层分化,具有“反梯度”特征。司法信任度较低的社会中上阶层更多地利用司法资源并掌握网络话语权,使得司法界、法学界在司法实践、社会舆论中接收到大量消极、负面的评价,并将主流舆论误以为民意的主流,从而产生“司法信任认知偏移”。由此文章提出,应理性、系统、全面地理解司法信任现状,而不应被片面的信息所蒙蔽。
Judicial and legal circles generally hold the view that there is a problem of “lack of judicial credibility” in contemporary China, but the data from many surveys show that people have a high degree of judicial trust. This article refers to this contradiction as “judicial trust cognitive bias shift”. To explain this phenomenon, this paper uses CGSS2010 and CGSS2012 data to carry out research. The study finds that on the one hand, the judicial system as the object of trust is in the “gradient trust”, and the trust in the judicial system is between the central government and the local government. “Behind the Phenomenon of Cognitive Offset of Judicial Trust ” implies differences between Eastern and Western cultures and systems. On the other hand, the people’s trust in the judicial system has stratification and has the characteristic of “anti-gradient”. Judicial and legal circles have received a large number of negative and negative comments in the judicial practice and public opinion, and mistaken the mainstream media for the fact that the upper middle class with lower level of judicial trust make more use of judicial resources and have the right to speak online. The mainstream of popular opinion, resulting in “judicial trust cognitive bias ”. Therefore, the article proposed that the status quo of judicial trust should be rationally, systematically and comprehensively understood, and should not be deceived by one-sided information.