论文部分内容阅读
面对现代与后现代的论争,本文站在哈贝马斯的交往行为理论的角度,认为两者论争的核心在于对理性的不同态度。文章以具有后现代主义倾向的汉学家弗朗索瓦·于连的著作为例,论述了完全抛弃理性的不可行性。本文拟从三方面进行论述,第一部分考察主要后现代主义者的学术观点,并从中总结出共同的学术取向;第二部分,分析弗朗索瓦·于连著作中的这种后现代主义倾向;第三部分,从哈贝马斯的理论角度阐述后现代主义思想的问题所在。
Faced with the controversy between modernity and postmodernity, this article stands on Habermas’s theory of communicative action and holds that the core of the dispute between the two lies in the different attitudes towards reason. Taking the works of the Han scholar Francois Yuellen with the postmodernist tendency as an example, this article discusses the impossibility of completely abandoning rationality. This article intends to discuss from three aspects. The first part examines the major postmodernists’ academic views and concludes their common academic orientation. The second part analyzes the postmodernist tendencies in François-Yuelian’s writings The third part elaborates the problem of postmodernism from the perspective of Habermas’s theory.