读柯罗连科回忆车尔尼雪夫斯基,对其中的一个自注很感兴趣。注文说他所转述的车尔尼雪夫斯基在西伯利亚向狱友们朗读的一件作品是中篇小说,但沙加诺夫所转述并发表出来的作品却是一个剧本。自注说:‘我照理应该配合这个正确的指示而改作我的叙述’,但‘决心把我这段异文保留下来,并指出其可疑之处。’ Reading Corolynke recalled Chernyshevsky, one of the self-interest very much. The note says that one of the works that Chernyshevski transcribed to his fellow inmates in Siberia is a novice novel, but Schaganov’s work, which was relayed and published, is a script. The self-comment states: ’I should reasonably use this correct instruction to change my narrative,’ but I am determined to preserve my alien phrase and point out its suspicion. ’