论文部分内容阅读
关于刑法与刑事诉讼法之间的关系 ,历来存在“程序工具主义”和“程序本位主义”之争。前者忽视程序法自身的独立价值 ,将刑诉法的价值定位于为保障刑法的实施 ;后者特别重视程序法自身的独立价值 ,进而认为程序法是实体法的母体 ,以致形成了程序本位主义。我们认为 ,程序工具主义和程序本位主义都失之偏颇 ,因为它们均违背了马克思主义关于内容与形式的基本原理。藉此 ,我们主张 ,刑事诉讼法具有不可否认的自身的独立价值 ,但其首要价值是保障刑法的正确实施
There has always been a dispute between “procedural instrumentalism” and “proceduralist” regarding the relationship between criminal law and criminal procedure law. The former ignores the independent value of the procedural law itself and locates the value of the criminal procedural law in order to guarantee the implementation of the criminal law. The latter places special emphasis on the independent value of the procedural law itself, and then considers the procedural law as the parent of the substantive law and thus forms the procedural standardism . In our opinion, procedural instrumentalism and proceduralism are biased because they are both contrary to the basic tenets of Marxism on content and form. By this, we hold that criminal procedure law has its undeniable independent value, but its primary value is to guarantee the correct implementation of criminal law