民事诉讼中法官基于证据作出的判决能符合经验法则可以最大限度地促进司法裁判的可接受性,但司法裁判是一个能动的过程,经验法则存在于法官的自由心证中,直接影响着其对案件事实的认定。因此,如何规范经验法则在事实推定和证据评价中的适用及其相应的程序保障问题值得关注。 In civil litigation, a judge’s decision based on evidence can meet the rule of thumb to maximize the acceptability of judicial adjudication. However, judicial adjudication is an active process. The rule of thumb exists in the judge’s free testimony, The facts of the case identified. Therefore, how to regulate the application of the rule of thumb in factual deduction and evidence evaluation and its corresponding procedural safeguards deserve attention.