自民法典编纂正式写入党的十八届四中全会决定以来,关于未来的民法典中应否确认“其他组织”的民事主体地位问题,再次引发民法学界的激烈争论。支持者认为,将“其他组织”纳入民事主体范畴,反对者则认为这会导致同一财产的所有权重叠。在我看来,民事主体应采较为严格的准入标准,“其他组织”不宜成为民法典的主体类型。 Since the codification of Civil Code was formally written into the decision made by the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the issue of whether the civil code of the “other organizations” should be confirmed in the future civil code once again raised heated debates in civil law scholars. Proponents argue that “other organizations” are included in the civil subject category, with opponents arguing that this would result in overlapping ownership of the same property. In my opinion, the civil subject should adopt a more stringent access standards, “other organizations ” should not become the main type of civil code.