论文部分内容阅读
国庆前夕,接到徐南铁先生来信,要我为《粤海风》的百期纪念写一篇小文。说实话,这些年由于我不断陷入《香港小说史》、《张爱玲论》、《周作人论》等“学术泥潭”中,拔不出脚来,根本未能为《粤海风》写稿,说来很对不住南铁兄。既然南铁兄不计前嫌,以德报怨,我还敢再躲懒、不效命吗?我想到了一个题目:《粤海劲吹争鸣风》,就此写上几句。《粤海风》百期中,我的印象是颇为重视艺术争鸣的。百期优点自然很多,当然不止重视学术争
On the eve of National Day, I received a letter from Mr. Xu Nan Tie and asked me to write a short essay for the 100th anniversary of “Guangdong Sea Wind”. To tell the truth, in these years, I can not pull out my feet in the “academic quagmons” of “History of Hong Kong Fiction”, “Eileen Chang”, “Zhou Zuoren” Manuscript, it is very sorry South Rail brother. Since the South Iron Man not to be too late, to complain, I dare to hide lazy, not life? I think of a topic: “Yue Jin fresh wind dispute,” wrote a few words. In the “Hundred Years of the Guangdong Sea Breeze”, my impression is that there is a great deal of emphasis on artistic contention. Hundreds of advantages naturally many, of course, not only academic controversy