论文部分内容阅读
文论危机或者失语是在1980年代末期就已经提出、并迅速获得基本共识,此后一直是被反复讨论的热点话题,为了摆脱由于对西方话语的习惯性依赖所造成的能指浮泛与所指错位,恢复文论研究的阐释能效,学界提出了返回现实、转换古代思想资源等途径,但却始终未能取得有效的成果。所以如此,乃在于主体性不足或者空缺。在生命感知、文化浸润与现实关注的场域中重建话语的主体性,才可能获得面对西方、古代以及现实的第一人称视角,致力于理论的吸收与创造。
Literary crisis or aphasia was proposed in the late 1980s and quickly gained basic consensus. It has been a hot topic that has been repeatedly discussed since then. In order to get rid of the absurdity and misunderstanding caused by the habitual dependence on Western discourse , To restore the interpretation of the theory of literary theory energy efficiency, the academic community put forward to return to reality, the conversion of ancient thought resources and other means, but it has failed to achieve effective results. So, is the lack of subjectivity or vacancy. Only by reconstructing the subjectivity of discourse in the fields of life perception, cultural infiltration and practical concern, can we obtain the first-person perspective in the face of the West, the ancients and the reality and devote ourselves to the absorption and creation of the theory.