论文部分内容阅读
本文比较了注射硬化剂、电凝电切、微波热凝3种方法治疗胃部息肉32例(36颗息肉)的结果,其中男15例,女17例.息肉最小3mm,最大20mm.注射5%鱼肝油酸钠的15颗息肉,10颗成功地摘除,失败的5颗再经电凝电切(4例)和微波凝除(1例),失败率33%;电凝电切摘除息肉共10颗,微波凝除息肉共16颗,均一次成功,成功率100%.结论:注射硬化剂失败率高,且需多次注射,电凝电切虽然效果与微波相同,但价格高、操作不方便,而国产微波治疗仪则只有上述优点,适合于各级医院使州,故作者推广微波凝除法治疗消化道息肉.
This article compared the results of injection hardening agent, electrocoagulation, microwave coagulation in the treatment of 32 cases of polyps of the stomach (36 polyps), including 15 males and 17 females. The polyps are at least 3mm and the maximum is 20mm. Injection 5 Of the 15 polyps of sodium morrhuate, 10 were successfully removed. The 5 failed electrocoagulation (4 cases) and microwave coagulation (1 case) resulted in a failure rate of 33%. Ten, microwave polycondensation polyps a total of 16, were a success, the success rate of 100%. Conclusion: Injection hardener failure rate is high, and requires multiple injections, electrocoagulation, although the effect of microwave and the same, but the high price, operation Inconvenient, and domestic microwave therapy instrument is only the above advantages, suitable for the hospital at all levels to make the state, so the authors promote the microwave coagulation treatment of digestive polyps.