论文部分内容阅读
总量理论的研究对象是资本主义货币经济中的总量关系,这种总量关系的特征是处于历史时间中,企业家对货币利润的追求和对未来利润的不确定性预期影响着投资、产出和就业,并导致了总量关系的不稳定性。新古典理论家进行实物经济和货币经济两分,把资本主义动态的总量关系置于静态和比较静态的瓦尔拉斯一般均衡框架,并抽象掉总量关系的历史特征是新古典总量理论陷于各种逻辑困境的根源。本文研究了新古典总量理论的三种模式,揭示了它们内在的逻辑问题,说明它们揭示的不是资本主义总量关系,同时回顾了凯恩斯的总量理论,指出凯恩斯的总量理论是从根本上反对两分法的,在分析资本主义货币经济关系时,他使用的是移动均衡的动态的分析方法。
The research object of total theory is the aggregate relations in the capitalist monetary economy. The characteristics of such total relations are in historical time. The pursuit of monetary profits by entrepreneurs and the uncertainty of future profits are expected to affect investment, Output and employment, and led to instability in aggregate relations. The neoclassical theorists have dichotomized the real economy and the monetary economy, put the total relationship of capitalism dynamics in the static and quasi-static Walrasian general equilibrium framework, and abstract the historical features of the total relations as neoclassical theory At the root of all kinds of logical difficulties. This paper studies the three models of neoclassical theory of total quantity, reveals their inherent logic problems, shows that they reveal not the relationship of total capitalism, and reviews Keynes’s theory of total quantity. It points out that Keynes’s theory of total quantity is fundamentally In opposing the dichotomy, he used a dynamic analysis of mobile equilibrium in the analysis of the capitalist monetary and economic relations.