论文部分内容阅读
法官量刑裁量的合理性取决于法官接触量刑证据信息的时间、承担量刑证明责任的主体在证明中的力量对比和具体的量刑证据制度。定罪证据与量刑证据有不同的制度逻辑,我国法官使用相同的证据规则处理定罪证据和量刑证据不利于量刑证据信息的获取和法官量刑裁量的作出,平衡量刑程序中控辩双方的力量、重置量刑证据制度、充分保障法官接触量刑证据的时间和量刑证据信息占有量是解决量刑问题行之有效的方法。
The rationality of the judge’s discretionary measure depends on the time of the judge’s access to the information of the sentencing evidence, the comparison of the power of the principal who undertakes the sentencing burden of proof in the proof, and the concrete system of sentencing evidence. Judicial evidence and sentencing evidence have different institutional logic. Judges in our country use the same rules of evidence to deal with evidence of conviction and sentencing evidence, which is not conducive to the acquisition of information on sentencing and the determination of sentencing by judges. Balance the power of both prosecutors and defenders in the sentencing procedure and reset The system of sentencing evidence, the full protection of the judge access to sentencing evidence and sentencing evidence of information possession is to solve the problem of sentencing an effective method.