“对话”已成为新的基础教育改革的重要话语, 众多教育实践工作者正在积极地探索与践行对话式交往的种种形式。不过我们发现,“对话”中也出现了诸多“伪对话”景象,这难免会阻滞新课改的顺利推行。所谓“伪对话”是指,没有真正领悟“对话”的思想精髓,不是把它看作一种教育观,而仅将之等同于言语上的问答,貌似“对话”实为独白,与新课改基本精神背道而驰的教育行为。本文旨在剖析“伪对话”的表现与实质,并由此提出解决这一问题的基本思路,以期引起“对话”热中的冷思考。 Dialogue has become an important discourse of the new basic education reform. Many educational practitioners are actively exploring and practicing various forms of dialogues and exchanges. However, we have found that there have also been many scenes of “false dialogue” in “dialogue”, which will inevitably prevent the smooth implementation of the new curriculum reform. The so-called “pseudo-dialogue” refers to the fact that without really comprehending the essence of “dialogue,” it is not regarded as an educational concept but only as a verbal question and answer. It looks like “dialogue” is actually a monologue and a new lesson Education that runs counter to fundamental spirit. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the performance and essence of “pseudo-dialogue” and to put forward the basic idea of ​​solving this problem in order to arouse the cold thinking in the “dialogue”.