20世纪50年代后,特别是90年代以来美国批评界兴起了伊迪斯.华顿研究热潮,其中出现了不少由在当下语境下对原文进行重写和改写而形成的“误读”。本文以厄里奇和艾蒙斯这两位批评家对华顿的作品的“误读”为例,分析了这些“误读”形成的历史、文化语境,说明这些“误读”并非简单 Since the 1950s, especially since the 1990s, the criticism circles in the United States have raised the wave of research by Edith Wharton, in which many “misreadings” caused by the rewriting and rewriting of the original text in the current context have appeared. . Taking Erich and Emmers ’criticism of Walton’ s “Misreading” as an example, this article analyzes the historical and cultural contexts formed by these “misreadings” and illustrates that these “misreadings” are not simple