如果是从公平的角度来说,今年的AEA是比较公平的。整个行业之前的其它比赛是没有请这类型的裁判的,这是第二次,对于消费者来说这是一件好事,对于我们做这一行的来说这是一个新的尝试。我希望这样的比赛能做到公平、公开、公证,其中可能还有一些需要改进的地方。也许有人说裁判评分没有标准,更多的是看个人喜好,对于这次的裁判,我就觉得没有谁特别好与特别不好的。就跟我们日常做生意一样,每个到店的客户都有自己判断的标准,每个人对于音乐的了解和对音响的需求不同,我们不可能只凭一套功夫打天下,既然不可能有一模一样的看法,那么我们就必须让自己的安装和调音更加弹性。所以说,聘请行业外专业裁判执裁,让参赛选手更像是在日常销售一样。当然与其他消费者不一样的是,本次的裁判团本身对于音乐已经有很深刻的理解,所以 If it is from a fair point of view, this year’s AEA is more fair. This is the second time for the rest of the industry before the other type of referee, which is a good thing for the consumer and is a new endeavor for us to do this. I hope this kind of competition can be fair, open and notarized, of which there may be some areas for improvement. Some people may say that there is no standard referee rating, more personal preferences, for this referee, I think no one is particularly good and particularly bad. Just as we do business every day, each customer to the store has its own criteria for judging each person’s understanding of music and the different needs of the audio, we can not fight the world with a set of kung fu, since there can not be exactly the same Then we must make our installation and tuning more flexible. So, hiring outside the professional referee, so that contestants more like the same in the daily sales. Of course, unlike other consumers, the panel of judges themselves have a very deep understanding of music, so