“实体限制型”和“程序限制型”罪名变更模式分别为英美法系国家与大陆法系国家所采用,都具备一定的科学性,在各自国家的刑事诉讼制度中起到了一定的积极作用。“实体限制型”罪名变更模式在程序公正方面保障较为充分,但忽略了实体公正;“程序限制型”罪名变更模式则相反,在顾及了实体公正时,未能充分兼顾到程序公正。为了更好地实现程序公正与实体公正、公正与效率的有机统一,必须对我国现行的罪名变更模式进行结构性调整,构建一种新型的罪名变更模式———公诉事实同一的诉因变更模式。 The model of “entity limitation” and “program limitation” are respectively adopted by common law countries and civil law countries and have certain scientific features. They have played a certain role in the criminal procedure system of their respective countries The positive role. The mode of change of guilty conscientiousness is more adequate in procedural fairness but ignores substantive justice. The mode of change of guilty of “procedural restraint type” is, on the contrary, not taking due consideration of the procedural just. In order to better realize the procedural fairness and substantive justice, the organic unity of justice and efficiency, we must make the structural adjustment to the existing pattern of changing the guilty charges in our country and construct a new pattern of change of guilt - the same cause of public prosecution .