论文部分内容阅读
仲裁条款独立性原则在理论上迄今仍有争议,并在实践适用中呈现变化不定的特点。在我国,仲裁条款独立性原则经历了一个从接受、开始适用、适用误区、纠正至力争完善的过程。《涉外经济合同法》、《仲裁法》、《合同法》等立法先后对仲裁条款的独立地位进行了规定。各仲裁机构在规则更新中也逐年扩大仲裁条款独立性原则适用的范围。司法实践中,最高院的司法解释增加了仲裁条款独立性原则适用的情形。各级法院在案件的审理中,呈现出由拒绝适用到支持适用的趋势。但由于立法的限制,仲裁条款独立性原则的适用还存在不足之处,因此,《仲裁法》在今后的修改中应完善关于仲裁条款独立性原则的规定。
The principle of independence of arbitration clauses is still controversial in theory so far, and the characteristics of arbitrariness are presented in practice. In our country, the principle of arbitration clause independence has undergone a process from accepting, starting to apply, applying the erroneous zone and correcting it to strive for perfection. The Foreign Economic Contract Law, the Arbitration Law, the Contract Law and other laws have provided for the independent status of the arbitration clause. Each arbitration institution also expanded the scope of application of the principle of independence of arbitration clauses year by year during the rule updating. In judicial practice, the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court increases the application of the principle of independence of arbitration clause. Courts at all levels in the hearing of the case, showing a decline from the application of support to the applicable trend. However, due to the restriction of legislation, there are still some deficiencies in the application of the principle of independence of arbitration clause. Therefore, the Arbitration Law should improve the rules on the principle of independence of arbitration clause in the future revision.