虽然几近用滥的“一刀切”之词,至今在词典里尚找不到它的身影,但它作为一种实际的存在,不仅流传久远,而且日渐盛炽。所谓“一切”用不着赘言解释,谁都明白是怎么回事。这种形而上学的东西既是国人的一大癖好,又成为见怪不怪的沉疴。因而在“一刀切”的理念支配下,那种反映在用人问题上以文取人、以貌取人、以年龄和学历取人的现象便屡见不鲜了。其实,“一刀切”从来不是好办法。之所以说“一刀切”不是好办法,是因为它并不符合事物的客观规律。比方眼下职场上的各种招聘启事上,对年龄的要求就有非得“35岁以下”的死杠杠,对这种有失偏颇的条文,尽管众说纷纭,却不见收敛。我们姑且不论这种界定的理由,至少可说它缺乏科学性。这是因为:一则超出35岁的人才比比皆是,且年富力强,并非不中用;二则所有岗 Although almost indiscriminate “one size fits all” words can not be found in the dictionary so far, its existence as an actual existence has not only spread far and wide, but also increased gradually. The so-called “everything ” Needless to say, everyone understands what is going on. This metaphysical thing is not only a big hobby for the Chinese people, but also an indifferent indignation. Therefore, under the “one size fits all” philosophy, it is not uncommon for those who reflect on the issue of employing people to take people by their appearances, take appearances by people, and take their age and academic qualifications. In fact, “across the board” is never a good idea. The reason why “one size fits all” is not a good idea because it does not conform to the objective laws of things. For example, at the moment of various recruitment announcements in the workplace, the age-specific demands of the “age of 35 and below” have been ignored. The biased provisions do not converge despite their divergent opinions. Regardless of this defined reason, we can at least say that it lacks science. This is because: a person over the age of 35 abound, and the prime of life, not useless; two all posts