名家推荐后税费时期,农民“抗争”不减反增,“抗争”的形式虽然未变,其内容却发生重大变化,作者认为,被治理者与治理者形成机会主义博弈。乡村社会因此形成的“分利秩序”真实而普遍令人恐惧,应引起政策制定者与国家的高度重视。目前,国家对“三农”的“反哺-多予”的政策有效实践缺乏经验,将“好事办好”对各级政府而言都是一个全新的课题。——著名学者、华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院教授曹锦清 After the famous tax and fee period was recommended, the peasants ’struggle ’ did not reduce the anti-increase, while the form of “protest ” has not changed, its content has undergone major changes. The author believes that the supervised and the opportunist form the game of opportunism. Therefore, the formation of rural society “distorted ” real and generally frightening, should be caused by policy makers and the state attach great importance. At present, the state lacks experience in effective implementation of the policy of “nurturing - giving more ” to “agriculture, rural areas and farmers ” and will be a new topic for all levels of government. - Renowned scholar, Professor Cao Jinqing, School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology